Hexagonal packing is a more "natural" packing pattern than square packing. Are there any reasons beyond the obvious that modern display screens use the latter?
For example, the rasterization of a horizontal or vertical line on a square-packed display is trivial, but on a hexagonally-packed display, the rasterization of at least one of them is not. But what about an arbitrary line? My intuition tells me that an arbitrary line would have a "better" rasterization on a hexagonally-packed display. Would this carry over to an arbitrary image? Would photos look better with hexagonal pixels than they would with square ones?
If you have any questions on Hexagnoal Mesh, Hexagonal Wire Netting. We will give the professional answers to your questions.